Notice: this is my opinion, only, though I think it represents that of many of us involved in youth politics and the CRs in general.
I think the precednt of Michigan and the removal of Cassin is a bad bad thing, but that being said it is not the first time it has happened, but it represents the two streams of thought of what the College Republicans should be about.
1. A tool of the party to build youth support and turn that into foot soldiers for winning elections
2. A group of like minded conservative activists out to change campuses and the country
I have always belonged to camp number two, as evidenced by work AGAINST THE REPUBLICAN PARTY in the Toomey primary and my resoluteness of supporting the Constitution Party candidate Jim Clymer, after Specter won. To me the CRs is not about advancing up the ladder, scoring your points, setting yourself up for a political career, and being the pawn of the state parties. It is about making a real difference on campuses. To steal a phrase from Mike: I am a patriot first, a conservative second, and a Republican last. I am a Republican because it is how conservatives enact change, and if at some point it no longer is that then I will leave the party.
Under all legal circumstances what the Michigan State Party did was correct and it has the power to do it, and I think it even helped the just cause, but it was a very bad way of going about it. In the end had I been the Chairman of the Pennsylvania College Republicans in 2003, I would have endorsed Rep. Toomey and worked hard to get campuses to do also, though without coercing, threatening, or dividng, but allowing chapters to decide. I would have likely been kicked out of my spot because of it, and that would have been the perogative of the Republican State Committee, but it would not have been the right one. The CRs need some level of independence from the party, because, in the end, we are not their tool to be used how they see fit.
The careerists and Republicans-at-all cost folks out there, as well as some Davidson partisans, are probably gagging right now as to many the College Republicans are to get Republicans elected, and get positive press. I say no, the CRs fundamentally are about changing campues and to do that there needs to be a level of independence between them and the Republican State Committee. If all the CRs is about is padding your resume and setting up your run for Congress than the CRs are pointless, but if the CRs are about getting better, more conservative members elected and changing their campuses and campus opinion then we really have achieved something.
This is why I am involved in the College Republican Conservative Caucus.