May 25th, 2005

...now browsing by day

 

A silver lining?

Wednesday, May 25th, 2005

I agree with Gary that the “deal” could work out advantageously for us in the big picture, but let’s look at the bad first.

Looking into my crystal ball, I can see the Dems filibustering a Supreme Court nominee. DeWine and Graham will argue that the filibustering of a Supreme Court nominee would abrogate the deal and be willing to go nuclear, but this would leave the Democrats seeming “moderate” by having 5 RINOs of the band of weasels sticking together.

I do not forsee the Dems filibustering Bush’s first Supreme Court nominee. Remember, replacing Rehnquist with a conservative will merely keep the status quo balance on the Supreme Court. The Dems will probably raise hell like they’re doing for the Bolton confirmation battle, but they will save the filibuster for his second nominee if Bush is nearing lame duckhood and without a doubt on a possible third that would result in a conservative majority.

But here is the possible silver lining. Given that the Democrats will allow a vote on Bill Pryor, Priscilla Owen, and Janice Rogers Brown for federal court, wouldn’t they be obligated to do the same when nominated for the Supreme Court? Or as Gary noted, at least have to concede Bush’s less “extreme” nominees. Granted, the stakes would be raised, I think they would have to allow it as part of good faith in the deal. Pryor may have been too outspoken on abortion, and Owen and Rogers Brown have only made rulings on parental consent laws (please correct me if I’m wrong).

So, what I would like to see then is a conservative Hispanic nominated first, Owen second and Janice Rogers Brown to clinch it. Yeah, I don’t like playing race and gender cards, but we haven’t gotten a conservative without it in the post-Roe world.

Groundhog Voting Day

Wednesday, May 25th, 2005

Keep on doing it until you get it right. Think it couldn’t happen here?

Is Ford going to be an Edsel in TN?

Wednesday, May 25th, 2005

He’s running. One might give Rep. Ford credit for at least trying to stop the Pelosi insanity in the Democrat Party, but as Michael rightly warns us, it’s wrong to praise “moderate” Democrats too much for simply being sensible.

The “Deal”: Not Bad At All

Wednesday, May 25th, 2005

Now don’t get me wrong. I’m sick and tired of the “free-thinking” moderate Republicans (a.k.a. uber-RINO’s) undermining the conservative majority in the Senate. Who do these people think they are? The usual suspects - McCain, Chafee, Snow, Collins, Hagel - don’t care about compromise or the traditions of the Senate; they care solely about getting good press from the liberal media, and the way to do that is to distance yourself from the evil “right-wing” of the Republican Party. Sure enough, the Spineless Six have been hailed as bold and daring political heroes by the mainstream media: “the brave Senators who dared to defy the Bush White House and the powerful religious right.” Blah, blah, blah…. But surely real courage entails fighting for conservative principles and taking the resulting media hits, as President Bush, Majority Leader Frist and the other 48 conservative Senators have done and will continue to do.

Still, in spite of what all the conservative pundits are saying – including Rush Limbaugh, Bill Bennett, Laura Ingraham, Thomas Sowell – we did not get rolled in Monday’s deal with the Democrats. As a matter of fact, it’s just the opposite. The Democrats have been taken to the cleaners…only they don’t know it yet!
The problem is that no one – including our side - is looking at the big picture. What actually happened as a result of this deal is that, for all practical purposes, the filibuster as a means to obstruct judicial nominees is dead! Isn’t that what we wanted in the first place? And like Reagan winning the Cold War without firing a shot, we achieved this goal without having to initiate the so-called “nuclear option,” and thus avoided taking the huge hit from the mainstream media. The MSM was waiting with bated breath, ready to pounce on the Republicans like a cat on a cornered mouse. Can’t you just hear them repeating the mantra “…and the Republicans actually changed the rules in the middle of the debate!”
In the first place, we now will get confirmed the three nominees deemed by the Democrats to be the most “extreme”: Pricilla Owens, Janice Rodgers Brown, and William Pryor. Follow me on this. If these three are the most “extreme” - by the Democrats own definition - what does that make the others? That’s right…moderates! Does anyone really believe that the Democrats will now resurrect the filibuster to obstruct “moderate judges”? Majority Leader Frist has vowed that all of the remaining judges will be put forward for votes promptly, possibly within a week or two. Should the Democrats be foolish enough to filibuster any of these “moderates,” he has also vowed again to ignite the “nuclear option.” All the centrist Republicans who supported the agreement – including Susan Collins and Lindsey Graham – have likewise vowed to support Frist should it become necessary. Let me see…they give up the filibuster while we retain the right to use the “nuclear option” against the filibuster and have become united in our opposition to it. Sounds like a victory to me!
How about the seven Democratic “centrist” senators? I doubt very seriously that any of them would support a filibuster at this stage of any kind, most especially against the remaining “moderate” judges. Guess what. These people have been looking for a way to dissociate themselves from the Teddy Kennedy wing of their party… and now they have found it. Without these seven senators, the Democrats couldn’t filibuster Attila the Hun!
And don’t you see how foolish the Democrats are looking already? What was all the fuss about Pricilla Owens in the first place that they had to block her for four years? This so-called “extremist” will be confirmed today with a sizeable number of their own party voting for her! That’s some “extremist!” In other words, they’ve proven again for all to see that you can’t trust their judgment on who is really “extremist” and who isn’t. Like the little boy who cried wolf, their use of the label “extremist” has a definite “hollow ring” to it.
Let’s recap: the Republicans have effectively eliminated the filibuster without taking the huge media hit, while letting it be known that they retain the threat of the “nuclear option,” with their seven senators on record as supporting Frist should the Democrats be foolish to try the filibuster again. In addition, the Republicans appear as the “moderates” in the debate, willing to try compromise to avoid a Senate showdown. As an added side benefit, John McClain – by taking the lead on this and being so willing to side with the Democrats – has shown once again that he can’t be trusted and for all practical purposes has committed political suicide. Can anyone imagine him winning a single Republican primary in 2008? As usual the media has got it wrong again, making McCain the winner and Frist the loser.

Not bad, not bad at all.

Ravenel To Primary Lindsay Graham?

Wednesday, May 25th, 2005

Charles Ravenel lost a close primary to my preffered candidate Jim DeMint, but Ravenell was also a solid guy I wouldn’t mind having in the Senate. Well with Lindsay Graham wondering off the boat again Ravenell has started publicly criticizing Graham. Read more here at RedState. We’re not going to lose this seat and I would love to see Ravenel in the Senate and I think it would keep some more of these Red State RINOs in line. (Graham isn’t bad per se, but he ain’t fantastic so it might be worth making an example of him).

Freedom of Speech in Italy *Poof*

Wednesday, May 25th, 2005

This extremely disturbing article from the Washington Post notes that an Italian writer living in New York has been indicted in Italy for “stirring up hate” against Muslims, under a charge of defamation, by writing a book that stated:

In “La Forza della Ragione,” Fallaci wrote that terrorists had killed 6,000 people over the past 20 years in the name of the Koran and said the Islamic faith “sows hatred in the place of love and slavery in the place of freedom.”

An Italian Justice had this to say

“In Europe we are seeing the birth of a movement that is looking to silence those who don’t follow a single mindset, within which it is forbidden to speak ill of Islam, of homosexuals or of the children of homosexuals,” Castelli was quoted as saying in an interview with Radio Padania.

SO the light of liberty grows dimmer in the Old West too, these are dark days for Western Society indeed.

Bolton By End Of Week

Wednesday, May 25th, 2005

Sources on the Hill expect Bolton to come to a vote on the floor by the end of the week, but the prognosis is not good as even Sen. Thune (R?-SD) has suggested he’s leary of Bolton.

Cripes! What is in the water up on Capitol Hill? I can’t imagine the UN is a very popular institution up in South Dakota, and Thune is running like Bolton like he’s cryptonite. I honestly will be more angry if Bolton goes down then about the “Deal.” Any thoughts?