Miers contd.
Written by Jack O'Reilly on October 6th, 2005Joseph McCarthy,
You wrote that we didn’t support Judge Roberts. Where was this? I posted something from Ann Coulter, but explicitly stated that I didn’t think she believed what she was writing. Further, I helped organize students to go down to the Roberts confirmation and protest in support of him.
I just wanted to point out that the Roberts nomination and Miers nomination are not equivalent at all. Roberts is clearly a constitutionalist if you take a close look at his judicial decisions, while Miers is completely unknown.
I recently posted an article by the American Thinker that supported the Miers nomination so that we could see another side, even though I generally disagree with him. How can you say that we’re blinded by our own ideology?
And as for your argument in defense of Miers, it is truly on thin ice. There are many more qualified candidates in this country based on experience and known judicial philosophy.
The only argument I can come up with in favor of Miers is that Bush may realize that there needs to be some ambiguity as to how Miers will vote in order to get the RINOs to support the 5th judicial conservative that will tip the scales, whenever that may come.
6
PM
“…and protest in support of him.”
You can’t protest in support of someone, it’s just support.
Other than that logic issue, dittos!
6
PM
Protest against feminazis in support of roberts…Does that work?… It’s been a long week.
7
PM
You asked me a question, and here is your answer:
http://www.savethegop.com/archives/2005/08/04/souter/
Within days of Bush nominating Roberts to the Supreme Court, certain individuals on this website were already HOPING that Bush had let them down.
8
PM
“Within days of Bush nominating Roberts to the Supreme Court, certain individuals on this website were already HOPING that Bush had let them down”
No one is hoping Bush let them down. What is the matter with you? We are being vigilant, you are the biggest party-man I have ever seen.