Who is the Fascist? UPDATE!
Written by Benaiah on January 18th, 2007Ah the environmental movement. The new haven for every displaced communist, socialist, and anti-capitalist.
The Weather Channel’s most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming. This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to “Holocaust Deniers” and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists.
The Weather Channel’s (TWC) Heidi Cullen, who hosts the weekly global warming program “The Climate Code,” is advocating that the American Meteorological Society (AMS) revoke their “Seal of Approval” for any television weatherman who expresses skepticism that human activity is creating a climate catastrophe.
So those who worship at the global warming alter want to squash dissent and they want to try them Nuremberg style.
In addition, Cullen’s December 17, 2006 episode of “The Climate Code” TV show, featured a columnist who openly called for Nuremberg-style Trials for climate skeptics. Cullen featured Grist Magazine’s Dave Roberts as an eco-expert opining on energy issues, with no mention of his public call to institute what amounts to the death penalty for scientists who express skepticism about global warming.
Not exactly what I would call adhering to the scientific method.
h/t: Drudge
UPDATE! Check what out James Spann, operational meteorologist for nearly 20 years, has to say on his blog.
*Billions of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon. No man-made global warming, the money dries up. This is big money, make no mistake about it. Always follow the money trail and it tells a story. Even the lady at “The Weather Channel” probably gets paid good money for a prime time show on climate change. No man-made global warming, no show, and no salary. Nothing wrong with making money at all, but when money becomes the motivation for a scientific conclusion, then we have a problem. For many, global warming is a big cash grab.
*The climate of this planet has been changing since God put the planet here. It will always change, and the warming in the last 10 years is not much difference than the warming we saw in the 1930s and other decades. And, lets not forget we are at the end of the ice age in which ice covered most of North America and Northern Europe.
18
PM
yo, why can’t I post a comment?
18
PM
hey! alright. Here’s my schpiel
It’s really convenient to shut out people who are trying to help when you apply labels like “communist, socialist, and anti-capitalist.” But listen up.
When you damage our environment in the name of capitalism, you aren’t just killing yourself. It
would be nice if you would realize other people are depending on your decisions.
I am currently studying geophysics and brag that I’m not yet biased. Yeah, the first paragraphs
sound my beliefs, but I am still synethesizing information from many different sources. Please, if
you are of an independent mind, don’t depend on blogs to build a base for your ideas. Go to the
straightest source you can find. My recommendation:
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm
It’s quite a lot of reading, but very comprehensive. Enjoy!
18
PM
are you kidding? this is not amusing….
18
PM
alright, anyone who knows what the deal is, can you explain why I’m not allowed to say what I want?
18
PM
As far as I can tell your comments are being shown, not really sure what you’re talking about…
18
PM
Xandra, I see your comments also:
18
PM
Is someone going to fix the flagrant grammar error in the *title* of this post?
Someone just perusing this site might be fooled into thinking this is a haven for intelligent discourse before they read the text, or …uhh… the titles.
19
AM
Thank you anonymous3 for your thoughtful insight.
19
AM
Xandra, comments are moderated. Some posts, like yours, with web links are marked as spam. We are still ironing out the kinks of the new design.
As for your comment, who is being shutout here? It is the noted climatologists who are trying to shutout those who do not agree with their positions on global warming. Science should embrace varying ideas, only then can we actually reach the truth. The fact man is wholly responsible for global warming is a farce. Why do climatologists leave out the fact that the sun is getting hotter?
For a different perpective check out JunkScience.com
19
AM
I’m just going to take a second to complain about how freaking cold it is outside.
19
AM
I second the complaint about freezing my nads off outside. I blame global warming.
19
PM
I’m working on the rebuttal. But those sites, uff dah. There are a lot of links and things to read through.
But in the meantime, suppose both parties are telling us whatever they want for whatever reasons they have. So, you can’t really source anyone but yourself. Why would you not imagine global warming, or like the article says “greenhouse enhancement”… were possible?
And, if both our parties are still twisting the facts, why would the “communists” spend money to combat gw? Republicans want money for themselves, but why would the other side spend their money and ours on a fallacy?
Does anyone else wish government weren’t so corrupt? !!!!
19
PM
Uff dah is right.