Thompson Lacked That Star Quality

Written by Sam on January 27th, 2008
Thompson withdrew from the presidential race last week. He ended his campaign as he had conducted it, with a minimum of fuss and no wasted words. He released a withdrawal statement over the Internet. It was three sentences long, and he hasn’t been heard from since. My guess is we’ll be missing him dreadfully by spring.

The charge against Thompson, who entered the campaign last September when polls showed him a favorite among Republican voters, was repeated so often it became a cliché. Like most clichés it tells us more about the people who used it than about the state of affairs it was supposed to describe. His campaign lacked “energy.” He didn’t get out enough on the campaign trail, and, when he did, he didn’t hold enough events. His speaking style was too low-key, and his speeches were too long, and more often than not his “performance” in televised debates was lackluster. He just didn’t have the fire in the belly.

The Weekly Standard

That was precisely the problem.  We live in a flashy Hollywood society today and ironically Thompson didn’t fit the bill.  With the exception of the final Republican debate in Myrtle Beach prior to the South Carolina primary, there was no fire with Thompson, no fury, no spirit.  There were a lot of good ideas and lot of the right stuff to reign in the conservative base, but it wasn’t presented in palatable format.

This is the key difference between someone like Fred and someone like Barack Obama.  Obama has no ideas, no plans, no details, no nothing, but he’s an eloquent speaker and knows how to liven up the party.  Look how many people are gravitating towards that guy.  Thompson was more straight forward and not really the lively type so I think people just didn’t pay attention.

It shouldn’t be that way, but such is the world we live in today.  If you can’t catch the attention span of the American Idol crowd you’re just wasting your time.

3 Comments so far ↓

  1. Jan
    27
    7:35
    PM
    Ryan

    One of my friends compared Thompson’s style to that of the 19th century. It begs to question how many of our national heros from the past would have faired in front of the modern attention spans found in our society.

  2. Jan
    28
    6:43
    PM
    chaoticform

    Romney has to win.

    I know–with McCain, you “conservatives will go nuts” and start infighting, and that is necessary for you to reform.

    But I came across something that is–peculiar–about the future of this nation. So, hoping McCain wins do not help my intentions in the long run.

    I do not want Republicans becoming “moderates”. You guys tend to take party principles to an extreme, creating an authoritarian center.

    This will kill the chance for the nation to have a third minor party that is balanced. A McCain win in the Republican primaries is just devastating.

    Romney must win your nomination–Just so we can break the two into three.

  3. Mar
    3
    8:05
    PM
    Jessica

    I think Fred Thompson would have been great for our country and he could have helped us improve in a lot of areas. Also, just because he is straight forward and not all out there it doesnt mean it is a bad thing. He had some great ideas.

Spruce up your comments with
<a href="" title=""><abbr title=""><acronym title=""><b><blockquote cite=""><cite><code><del datetime=""><em><i><q cite=""><strike><strong>
New comments are moderated before being shown * = required field

Leave a Comment