25 Mar

BAGHDAD, March 24 — Followers of influential Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr launched a civil strike Monday to protest raids and mass arrests by Iraq’s security forces, underscoring the growing frustrations of Sadr’s group, which U.S. military officials say is playing a key role in keeping down violence in Iraq.
In some Baghdad neighborhoods, Sadrist leaders called on shopkeepers to shut their stores and for bus and taxi drivers to cease operations. Fadhil al-Bahadli, head of Sadr’s office in the al-Amil district in southwest Baghdad, said followers were planning demonstrations over the next three days.
“We want security and we want to release detainees,” said Qais al-Karbalaie, a spokesman for Sadr’s office in Baghdad’s Kadhimiyah enclave. “Our major reasons for this civil strike are the release of detainees and to stop random arrests.”
A cease-fire imposed by Sadr on his Mahdi Army militia is widely viewed as a major reason for the drop in violence across Iraq in recent months, along with a U.S. troop buildup and the rise of a Sunni movement that has turned against Islamist extremists. But in recent weeks, Iraqi security forces have clashed with Mahdi Army militiamen and conducted large raids and arrests of Sadr followers in southern Iraqi towns such as Kut and Diwaniyah. Sadrist leaders in Baghdad said that they were still obeying the cease-fire and that the demonstrations would be peaceful.
Letting this man live in the name of trying to fight a politically correct war may very well go down as one of Bush’s greatest blunders. Although, some would consider that honor to belong exclusively to the war itself.
3 Responses for "Al-Sadr Creating More Unrest"
Going to war was not the blunder per se, but the gross incompetence in the aftermath serves as the origins of the blunders throughout the conflict. But what should we expect from an administration who talks about platitudes instead of realities. Instead of having a realistic plan, Bush went along with a bunch of idealist nonsense that was bound to fail.
To separate these many blunders from the responsibility of both the Pentagon and the Whitehouse is a mistake IMO. The post-Vietnam officer corps is ill-equipped to lead any sort of fight, much less one that involves creative, outside the box thinking. Bush has botched both fronts of this war badly, but the military leadership has done just as badly if not worse than he has when it comes to decision making.
The sad part is that many of the younger, more dynamic officers are not being rewarded for their success on the ground by their superiors. An exodus of young officers leaving the military is going to cripple us for the next 25 years or so.
I think we have to give most of the military a better level of congratulations than most of you have.
Since the new strategy was adopted a year ago we all know the situation has turned around completly. This strategy has been well executed by all levels of the military, especially the mid to lower levels of the military. For example, many colonels have had to basically “run” parts of Iraq in conjunction with tribal leaders and Iraqi military officials. Now that those buffons Rumsfeld, as well as General Casey and General Abizaid are gone the situation is improving. Their strategy was obviously massively flawed and I think we have to give John McCain credit for pointing it out earlier.
In relation to the actual post about Muqtada Al-Sadr, it is worth noting that in Basra the operation to take on the militia is being done almost entirely by Iraqis. (I think the U.S. Military is providing air support). Some have defined success in Iraq as “an Iraq that can stand up for itself and is an ally wth us in the War on Terror.”
Everyone is going to hate on this, but I think the fact that the Iraqi Army is conducting an independent operation against the Iranian backed Al-Sadr is a good measure of success.
Leave a reply