<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada Free Press: The World is Cooling</title>
	<link>http://www.savethegop.com/2008/05/02/canada-free-press-the-world-is-cooling/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.savethegop.com/2008/05/02/canada-free-press-the-world-is-cooling/#comment-340763</link>
		<author>Roger</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savethegop.com/2008/05/02/canada-free-press-the-world-is-cooling/#comment-340763</guid>
		<description>You cite an editorial (an opinion) about an article by an author from The Center for Global Food Issues, which is a project of the conservative think-tank, the Hudson Institute.  It is not scientific at all.

The scientific data regarding global warming goes back 100 years, not just 1992. 

The source of your information is biased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cite an editorial (an opinion) about an article by an author from The Center for Global Food Issues, which is a project of the conservative think-tank, the Hudson Institute.  It is not scientific at all.</p>
<p>The scientific data regarding global warming goes back 100 years, not just 1992. </p>
<p>The source of your information is biased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.savethegop.com/2008/05/02/canada-free-press-the-world-is-cooling/#comment-340762</link>
		<author>Roger</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savethegop.com/2008/05/02/canada-free-press-the-world-is-cooling/#comment-340762</guid>
		<description>You are a skeptic because you have no clue what it is all about, and your  comment proves that.  You cite a single editorial (not even an article, an opinion) as fact, luckily, that is not how science works.  You do know that the world is round - or do you still doubt that as well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a skeptic because you have no clue what it is all about, and your  comment proves that.  You cite a single editorial (not even an article, an opinion) as fact, luckily, that is not how science works.  You do know that the world is round - or do you still doubt that as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
